Nolan M. Kavanagh
  • Me
  • Career/CV
  • Research
  • Tutoring
  • Blog
  • Study Abroad
  • Nepal
  • Things I Like
  • Contact

Time to Clean Your Facebook

7/29/2016

0 Comments

 
Image: Facebook flag
(Nolan M. Kavanagh)
​In a presidential campaign that feels endless, the primaries have finally ended. So passes another milestone in the contest to choose the next leader of the free world — but don’t ungird your loins yet, because the last part is nastiest. And with the end of the primaries, folks, it’s time again to clean our Facebook feeds.

As our political culture has become increasingly polarized, so too has social media. Over the past six months, whenever we’ve opened Facebook or Twitter, we’ve unavoidably scrolled past anti-whomever posts of whatever kind.

However, many posts go beyond criticizing policy. Beyond signaling support. Many are neither inviting nor measured. They are angry. Hateful. They delegitimize other candidates as having won by conspiracy or foul play and therefore deserving overthrow or worse because they must, by having won, be evil itself.

They’ve displaced cat videos. Which, frankly, upsets me.

In the digital age, we commonly express our frustrations, political and otherwise, on social media. Facebook, Twitter, and other apparatuses leverage the pseudo-anonymity of posting online against our captive, ready-made audience: friends, family, colleagues, and whomever else we’ve befriended over the years.

But unlike typical posts, these ones alienate friends, especially with different views. The meme-oriented nature of social media promotes dubious, mud-slinging character attacks. And rarely, in my experience, do Facebook “debates” remain civil, nor does the character limit of Twitter foster nuanced discussion.

I’m sure you’ve seen it, too.

The culprits are young and old alike, across ideological and demographic divides. Among my college-aged friends, as Bernie Sanders’ chances dwindled, the anti-Hillary Clinton posts sky-rocketed, as did the anti-establishment and anti-rich ones. Among more conservative friends, the posts have been eerily similar: anti-Clinton, anti-Donald Trump, or anti-establishment, depending. And the dismissiveness of Clinton supporters stems from the same trend.

The end of the primaries might have, in another era, marked the joyous reuniting of embattled political parties (or the dog-tailed return of rogue members after populist forays). In the modern age, this might mean the deletion of now-embarrassing posts on Facebook, the scathing ones in which we attacked and delegitimized the candidates and voters that, in the end, represent our friends.

But not this time. Our political culture has, apparently, become so polarized that Sanders supporters continue publishing conspiratorial posts and chastisements of Clinton’s FBI investigators well after she’s clinched the nomination — it’s been months — and after their own candidate has transitioned from revolutionary ambition to stubborn temper tantrum to, ultimately, unity with her.

The conspiracy of last month, for example, was systematic voter fraud in California, which claimed to “prove” that Sanders actually won the state’s primary — despite trailing in state polls in the preceding weeks, despite Clinton’s strength in California’s early voting, which comprises a large portion of the state’s vote, and, of course, despite his fourteen-point deficit in the popular vote throughout the primaries as a whole. Not even alleged “collusion” by the D.N.C. against Sanders could manufacture a margin that large.

Is this who we are?

Of course, the nature of Facebook only feeds the frenzy: a steaming, unfiltered pot in which low-quality information can circulate without barriers of entry, and where group-think self-selects for desired information that enflames whatever pre-existing biases we have about the American political landscape, the opposing party, or the standard-bearers that we love to hate.

This election is unlike any other. As a college student whose Facebook feed is saturated by Sanders crusaders, I unfairly pick on them — Clinton supporters dismissed his candidacy. And after Donald Trump clinched his party’s nomination, many Republicans responded as Sanders supporters did. These frustrations, ironically, suggest that our system isn’t corrupt enough: that party leaders cannot (or will not) override the majority for one’s candidate.

In any case, the defining mood of the American electorate is polarized mistrust. And, as consequent, so too is the mood of our Facebook feeds.

But as we close the primary season, we must come to grips with the present state of things: Trump is the Republican nominee, and Clinton the Democratic. As distasteful many of us may find it, as “unfair” the process has seemed, we cannot delegitimize the wide voting margins by which both candidates won. Their winning does not signal a corrupt system. It signals American democracy, in which we exercise voting rights and concede to the majority.

In accepting their winning, we must drop the baggage of the primary battles. The Bern hereon must be survived by updated Democratic Party ideals and its nominee, not by the overstayed “welcome” of a challenger whose chances evaporated long ago. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio must be survived by whatever remains of the Republican Party after November.

Our democracy is beautiful. We have the greatest privilege: to freely choose candidates that best represent us (or to run ourselves), to express our dreams and frustrations without fear of discrimination or repression, and to vote. Our polarization — and our Facebook posts — reflects this freedom. But, in order for democracy to function, we must also cooperate. We must compromise.

If we lose, we must embrace it. And move forward, too.

Let’s enter a post-polarization era without conspiratorial rejections. Let’s scrub our Facebook feeds clean of hateful and hate-mongering posts that alienate friends. (Really, have they ever convinced you?) Let’s unite around common goals. And, once November comes and goes, let’s again clean our social media of political frenzy and, having accepted the election results without polarized protest, work with our new president to further our most important interests.

Because that is American democracy. And because I miss my cat videos.
0 Comments

To All College Students: Go Abroad.

7/14/2016

2 Comments

 
Image: Colosseum
While studying abroad, I walked the thousands-year-old steps of Rome. Here I am inside the Colosseum. After this experience, the world has become my campus. (Austin Fehr)
​An Open Letter to College Students:

Last January, after twenty hours of restlessly kneading airplane armrests and turbulent snowstorms, I landed in Madrid, Spain. I staggered off the plane and cowered before a city that stretched outward many miles, yet whose bulk was obscured by a haze. I swallowed hard. Then loaded into a taxi.

That was day one of study abroad.

I had never ventured off campus before, save for home and sheltered vacations. But when I left Madrid five months later, the world had become my campus. I had done it all: leapt closer to Spanish fluency, learned about diverse topics, taught grade schoolers English, tasted fearlessly, and immersed myself in independent adventure.

My confidence had heightened, as well as my awareness of the world. The experience had honed my passions and redirected my academic and career aspirations.

I had redefined myself.

College is for exploration. It’s for expanding horizons and violating comfort zones. While you will take a unique path, pursuing diverse passions and activities, study abroad can benefit you. There is a mind-opening quality about it. You see the world. You establish a second home. You sharpen communicative skills and may radically change your outlook on life.

Every path witnesses new views, perspectives, and ideas. If we are to challenge ourselves emotionally and intellectually, to grow as individuals, why not take that path abroad? Why not wander off the beaten Diag and onto the cobblestone streets of Lisbon or the thousands-year-old steps of Rome? Why not climb the Andes Mountains or double kiss Spaniards or share airplane conversations with South Africans?

Our footprints are our legacy. They tell our story — the long, triumphant strides when we sprinted to new heights, the stumbles when we grappled with unforeseen challenges. They trace the places we have ventured, the choices we have made. And although the rain and wind naturally smooth them away when we’ve long disappeared from the path, the routes we forge inspire others. They chart the unknown. They open new worlds to those that follow.

When I stepped off the airplane into the cool Madrid night, I hadn’t a clue where my path would lead. The miles ahead were hazy, dark, shrouded from sight by the big-city smog. But however threatening the path appeared then, however uncertain I felt, the miles I conquered thereafter were far more rewarding than whatever miles I would’ve repeated at home.

And so I continue forging. I continue chasing profound experiences. Because that’s the impact of study abroad. It instills within you a hunger to uncover new and unseen paths. To chart them for future reference. And to carry those experiences with you as a reminder that you can conquer anything because, after all, you’ve already conquered the world.

Chart your path. Chase adventures. Study abroad.

Sincerely,

Nolan M. Kavanagh
University of Michigan
nolankavanagh.com
2 Comments

    Blog

    I like health care and politics. I sometimes write about them.

    For the posts from my study abroad adventure in Madrid, Spain, click here.

    Archives

    July 2018
    June 2018
    August 2017
    June 2017
    March 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016

    Categories

    All
    Nepal
    Politics
    Study Abroad

    RSS Feed

© 2021 Nolan M. Kavanagh  |  Curriculum vitae  |  Contact me